Glossary Terms
CP analysis:
In evaluating and judging individuals, we consider
the way people are, all else remaining equal , to
be irrelevant. What we're interested in is the potential
of an individual all else being different. CP is
an acronym for ceteris paribus, Latin for "all else remaining the same".
Example: Based on cp analysis, a person who tells us he
spends the whole day watching TV and eating junk food
would seem non-impartial because in the particular
environment that he is, there is no relevant difference
between him and a non-impartial. Based on ncp (not ceteris paribus)
analysis, we would ask what this person's potential would
be in a different kind of environment. Only if the person
is happy and content to be as he is now would we attach
much relevance to what he told us because in that case,
he is implying that a different environment won't make
a difference to him.
Decision-based:
(1) of or involving a decision; for example, asking
"should I move to California?" is a decision-based question
(2) Concerned only with making the optimal decisions
toward NSG; characterized by a tendency to dismiss
memetic baggage that distracts and slows down. For
example, decision-based thought necessarily rejects
following the news and current events as memetic
baggage.
Egocentric:
Impartial philosophy is egocentric in that only the
things one sees, feels and otherwise observes are
considered certain and beyond doubt. This is
distinctly different from monotheistic religions, for
example, which require faith in something that does not
follow directly from one's sensory inputs. It is
also different from any philosophy that denies that
reality is an illusion. For example, it is possible
that what we perceive as reality is a computer game in
which certain tasks have to be fulfilled in order to
advance to the next level.
Fact-based:
(1) of or involving factual knowledge; for example,
asking "who is the president of the US?" is a fact-based
question (2) Characterized by an impractical or pedantic
preference for thinking about what is factually true
or false; valuing knowledge and comprehension using
one's own mind as an end in itself. For example,
wanting to understand advanced mathematics is a
strong indication of fact-based thinking
because one wants to do what someone else will do
sooner or later anyway, indicating a lack of a
sense of strategy.
Impartial:
When we use the word impartial, it means that one's
emotions or wants do not bias one's strategy for
attaining the goal. It does not mean that one does
not feel emotions and wants, or that one is not motivated
by them. One is impartial if one believes that
there is nothing worth pursuing except for the goal.
Therefore, every thought and action is intended to help
achieve it. For example, an impartial may
develop racial prejudice or may dogmatically insist
that he won't judge someone on the basis of race.
There is no inherent preference one way or the other,
since such a preference would imply that one possesses
values, beliefs, and goals that conflict. In impartiality,
there is only the single goal.
Independent Derivation:
see simultaneous generation.
Information stuffing:
In our information age, the availability and variety
of sensory stimulations is very high; the amount of books,
music, movies, people, and place to go and visit is so
large one will never exhaust even a tiny fraction of
what's available. Information stuffing refers to
to the insatiable drive to produce and consume all
this information. We spend nearly all our waking
time stuffing information, yet none of it adds anything
fundamentally new. As adults, we have seen similar
information countless times before. As information
is consumed at a rate at which proper analysis is
impossible, non-impartials learn to merely adapt
to the information and become bored as soon as
they stop processing more "new" information.
Information ignoring refers to the deliberate
act of ignoring or avoiding information as a counter
to information stuffing.
Logic:
For us, logic is the collection of methods of arriving
at decisions, excluding those that are based on
arbitration, faith, emotion, or contradiction.
NSG:
Non-Specific Goal. The single goal.
Macrocompetitive:
(1) characterized by controlled or decision-based
design; in this sense, we could say that while our
genes are the product of microcompetition, computer
software is more macrocompetitive in nature (2)
advantageous only in conjunction with many
coordinated changes; for example, I could say that
his invention of a technology for which there
is no immediate application or use made me wonder
whether he had macrocompetitive intentions (3)
part of a strategy to attain NSG; note that
meaning (3) is always implied when the word
macrocompetitive is used, but sometimes meaning
(1) or (2) are implied in addition to (3)
Market meme:
An idea that is popular or widespread in the
present meme market by virtue of being repeated
the most. This is measured based on
how often the idea pops up in the media, writings,
or human conversations.
Meme resistance:
A measure of how effectively an individual
is able to resist internalizing common views,
beliefs, and opinions. Example: His religious
faith immediately gave him away as a person
of low meme resistance.
Microcompetitive:
(1) controlled by forces of adaptive evolution;
characterized by natural selection or survival of
the fittest (2) creating an incremental advantage
all other factors being as they are; example: circumstances
forced the impartial to employ the microcompetitive
tactic of dressing well during the job interview to
make a good impression; the advantage created is
incremental because the tactic works only in the context
of a very particular type of culture; all other factors
being as they are means that the culture is assumed
to be constant and given (3) anything not part of the
strategy to attain NSG; for example, we could say that
every other website besides ours is microcompetitive
in nature; note that meaning (3) is always implied when
the word microcompetitive
is used, but sometimes meaning (1) or (2) are implied
in addition to (3)
PSG:
Personal Specific Goal. A goal an impartial pursues
that is of interest only because of his particular
circumstances; for example, learning the English
language might be a PSG an impartial pursues; this
goal is personal in nature, meaning that many other
impartials would not be interested in this goal
Simultaneous Generation:
In impartiality, there is no sense of ideas
belonging to particular individuals. It is assumed
that an idea expressed by one individual could just
as easily have been thought of by another impartial.
When impartials arrive at different conclusions,
it is assumed that given enough time and experiences,
they will eventually arrive at the same conclusions.
Ever time an impartial says something, it is understood
to be the best guess so far. There is an implicit
expectation that impartial logic will lead different
indviviuals to simultaneously generate (same as
independently derive) the same ideas. When
an impartial comes up with an impartial theory,
concept, or conclusion that is completely new, it
is nonetheless an achievement of the impartial whole;
there is no individual achievement in impartiality.
Scientific:
Our use of the word scientific is in relation to the
massive amounts of data that we perceive through our
senses. The scientific approach to analyzing a
pattern is to find the simplest consistency in that
pattern. Simplest means an
explanation requiring the least number of additional
factors. For any pattern, there are infinite
explanations; however, probability and reason dictates
that the one with the least factors is by far the most
likely.
An example would be: One has an object.
When that object is let go, it falls down. The
scientific conclusion is that any object that is let go
will fall
down. Based on the facts presented, that is the
most reasonable and probable observation. If one is
later presented with an object that does not drop, an
observation has to be made as to any factors that make
this object unique from others.
Strategic step:
(1) The act of interrupting one's thought to think
about the high level strategy in favor of
low-level details; impartials are unique in that they
take strategic steps to the maximum possible
degree, referred to as maximum strategic stepping.
(2) the step or coarse of action that has the highest
priority based on strategic considerations
|